What Is Teriparatide?
Published Oct 15, 2026 · 15 minute read
Teriparatide is a manufactured version of the active first 34 amino acids of human parathyroid hormone, sold by Eli Lilly as Forteo and approved by the FDA in 2002 for osteoporosis at high fracture risk. Most osteoporosis drugs slow bone breakdown; teriparatide instead drives new bone formation. Its strongest evidence comes from the pivotal trial, where a 20 mcg daily injection cut new vertebral fractures by about two-thirds compared with placebo.
Key Takeaways
- Teriparatide is the first 34 amino acids of parathyroid hormone. Given as one short daily pulse, it stimulates bone formation rather than only slowing bone breakdown.
- In the pivotal trial, 20 mcg daily lowered new vertebral fractures from 14% on placebo to 5%. In severe osteoporosis it also beat weekly risedronate on vertebral fractures.
- FDA removed the osteosarcoma boxed warning in November 2020 after human surveillance found no rise in cases. The rat finding stays in the label as a standard warning.
- An August 2026 label update added a warning for severe allergic reactions such as anaphylaxis and angioedema.
- No trial has tested teriparatide in people losing weight on GLP-1 medicines. Its approved role is osteoporosis at high fracture risk, and it has no shown effect on muscle.
Teriparatide shows up in peptide discussions because it is often called “anabolic.” That word refers to bone here, not muscle. For people on GLP-1 medicines, the more relevant question is whether bone thins as body weight falls, and what an approved bone-building drug can and cannot tell you about that.
The regulatory picture also shifted twice. In November 2020 FDA dropped the osteosarcoma boxed warning, and in August 2026 it added a warning about severe allergic reactions.
| Teriparatide at a glance | What to know |
|---|---|
| Other names | Forteo, Bonsity, PTH(1-34), recombinant human parathyroid hormone fragment |
| Class | Parathyroid hormone analog; bone-forming osteoporosis drug |
| US status | Prescription drug, approved 2002; not a scheduled anabolic steroid |
| WADA status | Not named on the 2026 Prohibited List |
| Route and labeled dose | Subcutaneous injection, 20 mcg once daily |
| Half-life | About 1 hour after subcutaneous injection, per the FDA label |
| Boxed warning | None since November 2020 |
| Main evidence gap | No trials in people losing weight on GLP-1 medicines, and no controlled evidence for muscle or injury recovery |
1. How does teriparatide build bone?
Parathyroid hormone, or PTH, is the body’s main controller of calcium and phosphate. It acts on bone and on the kidneys, and indirectly increases calcium absorption from the gut. According to the Forteo prescribing information, teriparatide binds the same PTH receptors as the natural hormone, with the same affinity. Forteo is produced in a genetically modified strain of E. coli.
What makes it a bone builder is timing. The same hormone can strengthen or weaken the skeleton depending on whether exposure is brief or constant:
| How PTH reaches bone | What happens |
|---|---|
| A short spike once a day, as with an injection | Osteoblasts, the cells that lay down bone, are stimulated more than osteoclasts, the cells that remove it. New bone forms on inner and outer bone surfaces. |
| Constantly high levels, as in hyperparathyroidism | Bone removal can outrun bone formation, which may damage the skeleton. |
That is why the drug is given as a single daily dose rather than a long-acting formulation. It is a peptide that clears quickly, so each injection produces a brief pulse.
Anabolic for bone, not muscle
Every outcome in teriparatide’s approval trials was bone density or fracture. We found no controlled trial showing that it adds muscle or improves performance. Readers concerned about muscle loss on GLP-1 medicines should treat bone and muscle as separate questions with separate evidence.
2. What did the fracture trials show?
Postmenopausal women
Neer and colleagues’ Fracture Prevention Trial enrolled 1637 postmenopausal women who already had at least one vertebral fracture. They received 20 mcg, 40 mcg or placebo daily, plus calcium and vitamin D, for a median of 21 months. The trial ended early because of the rat tumor finding described in section 6.
| Result | Placebo | 20 mcg | 40 mcg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Women with a new vertebral fracture | 14% | 5% | 4% |
| Relative risk vs placebo (95% CI) | — | 0.35 (0.22–0.55) | 0.31 (0.19–0.50) |
| New nonvertebral fragility fracture | 6% | 3% | 3% |
| Spine BMD gain beyond placebo | — | 9 percentage points | 13 percentage points |
| Femoral neck BMD gain beyond placebo | — | 3 percentage points | 6 percentage points |
BMD means bone mineral density, usually measured by a DXA scan. The higher dose raised density further but did not prevent more fractures and caused more side effects, so only 20 mcg was approved. The label’s analysis puts the 20 mcg arm’s absolute vertebral fracture reduction at 9.3% and the relative reduction at 65%, and reports normal mineralization in bone biopsies from 35 women.
Head to head with risedronate
The VERO trial by Kendler and colleagues compared two osteoporosis drugs using fractures, not just density, as the main outcome. It randomized 1360 women with severe osteoporosis to daily teriparatide 20 mcg or weekly oral risedronate 35 mg for 24 months under double-blind conditions. Lilly funded it.
| Outcome over 24 months | Teriparatide | Risedronate | Effect (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| New vertebral fracture | 5.4% | 12.0% | RR 0.44 (0.29–0.68) |
| Clinical fracture | 4.8% | 9.8% | HR 0.48 (0.32–0.74) |
| Nonvertebral fragility fracture | 4.0% | 6.1% | HR 0.66 (0.39–1.10), not significant |
Men and glucocorticoid users
In Orwoll and colleagues’ trial of 437 men, 20 mcg daily raised spine density by 5.9% and femoral neck density by 1.5% over a median of 11 months. The response did not depend on testosterone status, age or starting density. Fractures were not an outcome, so the male indication is framed as increasing bone mass.
Saag and colleagues compared teriparatide with daily alendronate 10 mg in 428 adults on long-term glucocorticoids for 18 months:
| Outcome | Teriparatide | Alendronate |
|---|---|---|
| Lumbar spine BMD change | +7.2% | +3.4% |
| New vertebral fracture | 0.6% | 6.1% |
| Nonvertebral fracture | 5.6% | 3.7%, difference not significant |
High calcium readings were more frequent with teriparatide in this trial.
3. Does teriparatide help with bone loss during GLP-1 weight loss?
No trial cited here has tested teriparatide in people losing weight with semaglutide, tirzepatide or any other GLP-1 medicine. Its approved use is osteoporosis at high fracture risk, not protecting bone during weight loss in general.
The concern itself has some data behind it. Jensen and colleagues’ 2024 secondary analysis followed 195 adults with obesity and without diabetes. After an 8-week 800-calorie-a-day diet, they were randomized for one year to exercise, liraglutide 3.0 mg daily, both, or placebo.
| Group | Estimated total weight loss | Bone density finding |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | 7.03 kg | Reference group |
| Exercise alone | 11.19 kg | Reference for the liraglutide comparison |
| Liraglutide alone | 13.74 kg | Hip and spine BMD fell more than with exercise alone |
| Exercise plus liraglutide | 16.88 kg | Hip and spine BMD not different from placebo |
The hip and spine differences between liraglutide alone and exercise alone were small, 0.013 and 0.016 g/cm² respectively. The study measured density, not fractures, and used liraglutide rather than newer GLP-1 drugs. It suggests that how weight is lost may matter for bone. It does not show that a bone drug is needed or helpful during GLP-1 treatment.
A DXA scan reports bone separately from fat and lean tissue, so the same scan used to follow body composition can also give bone density readings. Whether a person needs osteoporosis treatment depends on their own fracture risk, which a clinician assesses.
4. Is teriparatide FDA approved and legal?
Yes. The current label approves it for three groups, each limited to people at high fracture risk or who have failed or cannot tolerate other osteoporosis treatment:
- postmenopausal women with osteoporosis;
- men with primary or hypogonadal osteoporosis, to increase bone mass;
- adults with osteoporosis linked to ongoing glucocorticoid use of at least 5 mg a day of prednisone or an equivalent.
It is not approved for children. Several teriparatide products are now on the US market:
| Product | FDA application | Approval date |
|---|---|---|
| Forteo, Eli Lilly | NDA 021318 | November 26, 2002 |
| Bonsity, Alvogen | NDA 211939 | October 4, 2019 |
| Teriparatide, Amphastar | ANDA 213641 | December 12, 2025 |
The trial data on this page come from Forteo.
The 2-year limit became conditional
| Period | Label wording on duration |
|---|---|
| Up to the April 2020 label | More than 2 years of use in a lifetime was not recommended |
| Since the November 2020 supplement | More than 2 years should only be considered if fracture risk remains or again becomes high |
Controlled substance and sport status
Teriparatide is a prescription drug but is not among the anabolic steroids listed in Schedule III, 21 CFR 1308.13. It does not appear by name on the WADA 2026 Prohibited List. That list’s growth-factor class, S2.3, also covers unnamed factors that affect muscle, tendon or ligament protein synthesis or regeneration, and PTH analogs are not among its examples. Athletes should check with their anti-doping body rather than assume a compound is permitted.
A vial marketed online as research-grade teriparatide has not been through FDA review, so nobody has confirmed what it contains, how much, or whether it is sterile.
5. Teriparatide dosage and half-life, as labeled
The labeled dose is 20 mcg injected under the skin of the thigh or abdomen once a day. Each Forteo pen holds 28 daily doses and is thrown away 28 days after first use. It must be kept refrigerated except while injecting. The label recommends calcium and vitamin D supplements if dietary intake is too low, and advises taking the first doses where the person can sit or lie down.
Pharmacokinetic values from the FDA label:
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Bioavailability after subcutaneous injection | About 95% |
| Time to peak level | About 30 minutes |
| No longer measurable | Within 3 hours |
| Serum half-life | About 1 hour |
| Exposure in men compared with women | 20–30% lower at the same dose |
| Severe kidney impairment, creatinine clearance under 30 mL/min, 5 people | Exposure up 73%, half-life up 77% |
Lilly did not run dedicated metabolism studies. The label attributes breakdown to nonspecific liver enzymes, with the kidneys handling most of the elimination.
The effect on blood calcium outlasts the drug. Calcium begins rising about 2 hours after a dose, peaks at 4–6 hours with a median increase of 0.4 mg/dL, and returns to baseline by 16–24 hours. A half-life curve therefore describes the drug level, not how long its effects last.
6. Side effects and the osteosarcoma question
From boxed warning to standard warning
In two-year rat studies, teriparatide caused osteosarcoma, a bone cancer, in a dose- and duration-dependent way. Rates reached 40–50% in high-dose groups exposed to 3 to 60 times human levels. Monkeys treated for 18 months and followed for 3 more years developed no bone tumors.
Forteo therefore launched with a boxed warning, a 2-year lifetime cap and required cancer surveillance, as Krege and colleagues’ history describes. The human surveillance results led FDA to remove the boxed warning on November 16, 2020:
| Study | Who was included | What was found |
|---|---|---|
| Osteosarcoma Surveillance Study, 2003–2016 | US cancer registry cases; 1173 patients interviewed | 3 prior teriparatide users vs 4.17 expected; incidence ratio 0.72 (90% CI 0.20–1.86) |
| Forteo Patient Registry, 2009–2019 | 75,247 patients, 361,763 person-years | No cases; follow-up was shorter than planned |
| Two US insurance-claims studies, in the label | 379,283 and 153,316 users | 3 and 0 cases; risk similar to comparison groups |
For scale, osteosarcoma occurs in about 2.5 per million US adults aged 40 or older each year. The label still lists the warning, notes limited data beyond 2 years, and says to avoid teriparatide in people with higher baseline risk: open growth plates, Paget’s disease or other metabolic bone disease besides osteoporosis, bone metastases or past skeletal cancer, prior radiation to the skeleton, or inherited conditions that predispose to osteosarcoma.
Severe allergic reactions, added in 2026
FDA asked Lilly in April 2026 to add hypersensitivity information to labeling for parathyroid hormone products, and the S-059 update was approved on August 3, 2026. The label now lists anaphylaxis, angioedema (deep swelling) and hives reported with PTH analogs. The drug should be stopped if a reaction occurs, and stopped permanently after a severe one. A history of severe hypersensitivity to teriparatide or its ingredients is now the only contraindication.
Common effects
About 5% of healthy volunteers in short studies had brief dizziness from low blood pressure on standing, usually within 4 hours of an early dose. Pooled trial rates, with 691 people per group:
| Event | Teriparatide | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Joint pain | 10.1% | 8.4% |
| Nausea | 8.5% | 6.7% |
| Dizziness | 8.0% | 5.4% |
| Leg cramps | 2.6% | 1.3% |
| Fainting | 2.6% | 1.4% |
| Any serious adverse event | 16% | 19% |
Against alendronate in glucocorticoid users, nausea, pneumonia and shingles were more frequent with teriparatide.
7. Calcium, interactions and monitoring
Because each dose raises blood calcium for several hours, the label’s calcium findings are the main practical safety point. In trials, at least one high calcium reading 4–6 hours after a dose occurred in 11% of women and 6% of men, against 2% and 0% on placebo. Repeat testing confirmed it in 3% of women and 1% of men. Values over 13 mg/dL have been reported since approval.
Other points from the label:
- Hypercalcemic disorders. Avoid in people with conditions such as primary hyperparathyroidism.
- Calciphylaxis. Serious calcium deposits in small skin blood vessels have been reported. Risk factors include autoimmune disease, kidney failure, and warfarin or systemic corticosteroid use.
- Kidney stones. Rates matched placebo, but people with active or recent stones were not studied.
- Uric acid. Levels rose above normal in 3% versus 1% on placebo, without more gout.
- Digoxin. The calcium rise may make digitalis toxicity more likely.
- Diuretics. Hydrochlorothiazide and IV furosemide caused only small changes in calcium.
- Pregnancy and breastfeeding. No human data exist. The label says to consider stopping when pregnancy is recognized and not to breastfeed.
- Overdose. Accidental doses of up to 800 mcg, a whole pen, caused nausea, weakness and low blood pressure, with no reported deaths.
- Antibodies. About 3% of women in the pivotal trial developed them, without any effect on calcium or density response.
GLP-1 medicines are not among the interactions the label highlights, and no study cited here examined the combination. Calcium readings are most informative when the timing relative to the last injection is known, since the 4–6 hour peak differs from a level drawn the next morning.
8. Does teriparatide speed injury recovery?
Teriparatide is promoted online for healing fractures and tendons. Controlled human trials give mixed or null results:
| Trial | Design | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Wrist fracture, Aspenberg et al. | 102 postmenopausal women; placebo, 20 or 40 mcg for 8 weeks | Main comparison, 40 mcg vs placebo, not significant; a post hoc analysis found faster healing at 20 mcg, 7.4 vs 9.1 weeks |
| Hip fracture, Bhandari et al. | 159 patients; 20 mcg vs placebo for 6 months; stopped early for slow enrollment | No difference in revision surgery, healing on X-ray or pain |
| Pelvic fracture, Nieves et al. | 35 older adults; 20 mcg vs placebo for 3 months | No difference in CT healing or pain; physical performance improved only with teriparatide |
| Rotator cuff repair, Guity et al. | 50 adults aged 50–80; 20 mcg vs placebo for 3 months after surgery | No difference in shoulder function or pain at 1 year; retear rates 8.7% vs 10% |
A 2021 meta-analysis by Eastman and colleagues found better function with PTH analogues but no change in healing rate or pain. Most trials enrolled older people with osteoporosis, so evidence in younger adults is weaker. Muscle and ligament injuries have not been tested in any controlled human trial we could find. Unlike BPC-157, teriparatide is an approved drug, but injury healing is not one of its approved uses.
9. What happens after stopping, and what can you track?
Bone gained on teriparatide does not hold on its own. In the DATA-Switch extension by Leder and colleagues, women who moved from 2 years of teriparatide to denosumab kept gaining, reaching an 18.3% spine density increase at 4 years. Women who moved the other way lost bone, especially at the hip and wrist. Only 77 women were analyzed, but the authors concluded the order of treatments deserves attention.
The outcomes the trials used are the ones worth recording:
- Bone density. DXA results at the spine and hip, with the scan date and the same scanner where possible.
- Fractures. Any new fracture, including vertebral fractures found on imaging.
- Calcium. Blood calcium values with the time since the last injection.
- Dose log. Injection dates and times, pen start dates for the 28-day discard rule, and missed doses.
- Symptoms. Dizziness after early doses, joint pain, leg cramps, nausea and any allergic reaction.
If you are also on a GLP-1 medicine, logging weight and body composition alongside these makes later DXA results easier to interpret. A tracking log can organize that history for a clinician; it cannot show whether teriparatide changed your fracture risk.
10. Teriparatide FAQ
What is teriparatide used for?
The FDA label approves it for osteoporosis at high fracture risk in postmenopausal women, in men with primary or hypogonadal osteoporosis, and in adults with osteoporosis linked to long-term glucocorticoid use. Healing fresh fractures, tendon repair and muscle growth are not approved uses.
Is teriparatide legal?
In the US it is a prescription drug. It is not a scheduled anabolic steroid under federal law, and it is not named on the 2026 WADA Prohibited List, although that list's growth-factor class is open-ended. Products sold as research peptides are not FDA-approved medicines.
What are the side effects of teriparatide?
In pooled trials, joint pain, nausea, dizziness and leg cramps were somewhat more common than on placebo. The label also warns about transient high blood calcium, dizziness on standing after early doses, calciphylaxis, severe allergic reactions and the osteosarcoma finding from rat studies.
How long does teriparatide stay in your system?
Per the label, its serum half-life is about 1 hour and it is no longer measurable within 3 hours of an injection. The calcium rise it triggers lasts longer, peaking 4 to 6 hours after a dose and returning to baseline by 16 to 24 hours.
Does teriparatide still cause cancer?
Rats given teriparatide for two years developed osteosarcoma, a bone cancer. Large human surveillance studies did not find more osteosarcoma than expected, which is why FDA removed the boxed warning in 2020. The label still lists the risk and advises avoiding the drug in people with higher baseline risk.
Can teriparatide be used with semaglutide or tirzepatide?
No study cited here tested the combination, so there is no evidence on whether it changes bone outcomes during GLP-1 weight loss. The interactions the label highlights involve digoxin and diuretics. Anyone weighing both should do so with the prescriber who manages their bone health.
Does teriparatide build muscle?
No controlled trial has shown that it builds muscle or improves athletic performance. It is called anabolic because it builds bone. Its trial outcomes were bone density and fractures.
Can you take teriparatide for more than 2 years?
Before November 2020 the label advised against more than 2 years in a lifetime. The current label says longer use should only be considered when fracture risk remains high or becomes high again, and it notes limited data beyond 2 years.
11. Sources
References used for this article
- Eli Lilly: Forteo prescribing information, revised August 2026 (DailyMed)
- Eli Lilly: Forteo prescribing information, April 2020, with osteosarcoma boxed warning
- FDA (2020): NDA 021318/S-054 approval letter removing the boxed warning
- FDA (2026): NDA 021318/S-059 approval letter adding hypersensitivity labeling
- Drugs@FDA: Forteo, NDA 021318
- Drugs@FDA: Bonsity, NDA 211939
- Drugs@FDA: Teriparatide (Amphastar), ANDA 213641
- Neer et al. (2001): Fracture Prevention Trial in postmenopausal women
- Kendler et al. (2018): VERO trial, teriparatide vs risedronate
- Orwoll et al. (2003): Teriparatide and bone density in men
- Saag et al. (2007): Teriparatide vs alendronate in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis
- Leder et al. (2015): DATA-Switch extension, denosumab and teriparatide transitions
- Aspenberg et al. (2010): Teriparatide and distal radius fracture healing
- Bhandari et al. (2016): Teriparatide and femoral neck fracture healing
- Nieves et al. (2022): Teriparatide and pelvic fracture healing
- Eastman et al. (2021): Meta-analysis of PTH analogues for fracture healing
- Guity et al. (2025): Teriparatide after rotator cuff repair
- Krege et al. (2022): Teriparatide, osteosarcoma and the boxed warning removal
- Gilsenan et al. (2021): 15-year US Osteosarcoma Surveillance Study
- Gilsenan et al. (2021): Forteo Patient Registry cancer surveillance
- Jensen et al. (2024): Bone density after exercise, liraglutide or both following diet-induced weight loss
- eCFR: 21 CFR 1308.13, Schedule III controlled substances
- WADA: 2026 Prohibited List